<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop. Go. Stop. Go.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancysims.com/cityofhouston/stop-go-stop-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancysims.com/cityofhouston/stop-go-stop-go/</link>
	<description>by Nancy Sims. Parent, Public Relations, Professor, Pundit, Ponderer. Thoughts about my world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin whited</title>
		<link>http://nancysims.com/cityofhouston/stop-go-stop-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin whited]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancysims.com/?p=342#comment-1358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[** One of the things not mentioned in all of this is the red-light camera contract company. It has well-connected Houstonians involved as well as some powerful local lobbyists and consultants. I think this has made a difference in the process.  **

Good point. A second thing not mentioned -- or at least hardly mentioned -- is former mayor Bill White&#039;s role in amending the contract with ATS, to remove any reasonable opt-out provision. ATS cites that amendment in today&#039;s story by Chris Moran, yet inexplicably Moran doesn&#039;t pursue the implications of the amendment, or the driving force behind it. The change to the contract took place when Mayor White thought the red light camera revenue scheme was under threat of cancellation by the lege, and has left the City of Houston in a fine spot (since it cannot be denied the will of the voters has now been expressed, whether you think the referendum was legally valid or not).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>** One of the things not mentioned in all of this is the red-light camera contract company. It has well-connected Houstonians involved as well as some powerful local lobbyists and consultants. I think this has made a difference in the process.  **</p>
<p>Good point. A second thing not mentioned &#8212; or at least hardly mentioned &#8212; is former mayor Bill White&#8217;s role in amending the contract with ATS, to remove any reasonable opt-out provision. ATS cites that amendment in today&#8217;s story by Chris Moran, yet inexplicably Moran doesn&#8217;t pursue the implications of the amendment, or the driving force behind it. The change to the contract took place when Mayor White thought the red light camera revenue scheme was under threat of cancellation by the lege, and has left the City of Houston in a fine spot (since it cannot be denied the will of the voters has now been expressed, whether you think the referendum was legally valid or not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
